Flash game developers, who are like the plankton in the food chain of the video game industry, are more and more interested in developing games for Google’s Android mobile operating system, according to a new Flash Game Market survey.
The survey shows that the Flash game development community is becoming more mature and financially savvy, as the developers are focusing on the markets with the most potential for growth. It was produced by Mochi Media, which helps developers monetize their games, as well as Flash creator Adobe and FlashGameLicense.com. The survey of nearly 1,400 developers also shows that flash developers are open to getting their games on all sorts of new platforms in the name of reaching the widest number of users.
While 10 percent of the developers said they are currently developing on Android, more than 52 percent said they planned to begin doing so in the next year. That’s a big change from last year, when about 42 percent said they planned to make games for the iOS, or Apple’s iPod Touch, iPhone and iPad devices. Android has come on strong in the past year, toppling Nokia as the world’s leader in smartphones in the fourth quarter.
Flash gaming is also growing in popularity internationally, leading to new markets and talent pools. About 19 percent of the developers are from the U.S., down 15 percent from a year ago. About 8 percent are in the United Kingdom, and six percent are in the Russian Federation. Canada accounts for 5 percent, Ukraine is 4 percent, India is 4 percent, and Brazil is 3 percent.
Developers are making money through a lot of different means. Sponsorships are now the main source of revenues. The number of developers who report making money through sponsorships, licenses and custom game development increased 37 percentage points from the 2009 survey, jumping from 46 percent to 83 percent. In-game ads are also still popular, with 45 percent of developers taking advantage of this revenue stream.
The big change, Mochi Media product manager Colin Cupp said, is that developers now have access to many different types of monetization. Developers are also more experienced. About 27 percent have been making games for two to five years, and another 12 percent have been making Flash games for more than five years. About 8 percent of developers and publishers have published more than 21 games. But 63 percent have made five or fewer games.
“They can distribute their games and reach more people,” Cupp said. “They’re more sophisticated.”
About 60 percent of developers say they now make Flash games full-time, compared to 50 percent a year ago. Also, those developers are growing up into publishers, with 21 percent of companies now doing both development and publishing. Only 4 percent are just publishers. Some 75 percent say they are developers only, roughly the same as a year ago. In general, there’s still a shortage of Flash game developers, Cupp said.
About 97 percent of the developers are male and 75 percent of the developers are under 35. The largest age group is 25 years old to 35, which accounts for 43 percent of the population. A lot of the effort is solitary, with 57 percent of developers saying they make their games alone.
About 75 percent of games are made in less than three months. And 25 percent are made in less than a month.
But it’s still tough being a Flash game publisher. About 63 percent of Flash game sites get less than 200,000 visitors per month. About 32 percent of developers say that their games are played 200,000 times or less in their lifetimes. Only a lucky 3 percent say that their games have been played more than 10 million times. About 50 percent of developers say they make less than $500 a month from developing games. About 5 percent make more than $5,000 a month.
Here’s a look at last year’s survey.
Next Story: Egypt restores Internet access amid continued Mubarak protests Previous Story: Why rewriting code can be startup suicide
Some of the legal questions related to the individual mandate are, at least partially, policy questions. In particular, what does the individual mandate do? And can the law stand without it?
The argument conservatives are making right now is that the individual mandate regulates "economic inactivity." That's not a description anyone had heard of it back when conservatives were co-sponsoring bills with the individual mandate, and it's not what the policy's creator had in mind when he developed it. But that doesn't make it untrue.
To believe it, however, you need to adopt a very narrow definition of what's being affected here: Namely, the decision to purchase or not purchase health-care insurance. The more traditional view is that the individual mandate is one of a slew of rules and regulations bringing order to something much broader: The American health-care system, which all of us participate in. That's the view of the 38 health economists and academics who signed this brief (pdf). "There is no such thing as 'inactivity' or non-participation in the health care market," they wrote. "As the District Court" -- which ruled for the Affordable Care Act -- "recognized, virtually all Americans will, at some time during their life, require health care, either because of illness, accident, or the wear and tear of age."
Because health services are so expensive, the costs are defrayed over many years. That's what insurance does. And because we are a humane society, we have rules and regulations in place to ensure that people can get treated even if they don't have insurance. In that way, you may not be interested in the health-care system, but if you get hit by a bus, the health-care system is interested in you -- and that's true even though you weren't making an economic choice to become "active" in the health-care system when you stepped into the street. You were, by virtue of our laws and regulations and taxes, already an active participant. The authors of the brief make this point -- and its connection to the individual mandate -- well:
The requirement to obtain a minimal level of health insurance is predicated on the unique characteristics of the health care market -- the unavoidable need for medical care; the unpredictability of such need; the high cost of care; the inability of providers to refuse to provide care in emergency situations; and the very significant cost-shifting that underlies the way medical care is paid for in this country. Those characteristics do not obtain in other markets and, without them, the predicate for the kind of regulation adopted in Section 1501 does not exist. Hence, affirming Congress’ power to adopt Section 1501 will not open the door to unfettered expansion of federal power over individual liberty, as Appellants fear.
To make this more concrete, when an uninsured person breaks a leg and needs hospital care, that care is paid for by the rest of us. It'd be a bit odd for your economic inactivity to cost me money. But your decision to remain without insurance does cost me money, because you're an active consumer of health-care risk and an active participant on a health-care market that affords you certain benefits. When you don't purchase insurance, you've not decided against participating in the American health-care system. You're just not participating responsibly. To quote Mitt Romney:
Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on the government is not libertarian.
Then there's the question of severability -- can the law work without the mandate? The legislation does not specifically say that it can. And the Obama administration, in a calculated gamble to persuade the Court that the mandate passes constitutional muster through the "necessary and proper" clause, is currently arguing that it can't. This, at least in part, led Judge Vinson to void the entire bill. "In the final analysis, this Act has been analogized to a finely crafted watch,and that seems to fit," he wrote. "It has approximately 450 separate pieces, but one essential piece (the individual mandate) is defective and must be removed. It cannot function as originally designed."
The irony of all this is that one of the central arguments in the Democratic campaign for the presidency was between the Obama campaign, which didn't think health-care reform required an individual mandate, and the Clinton campaign, which thought it did. I was on Clinton's side in that debate, but the case is more nuanced than the Obama team allowed then or is admitting now. The legislation will work much better with an individual mandate. But many people will be covered, and many goals achieved, in the absence of the mandate.
benchcraft company scamAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
bench craft company reviews Flash game developers, who are like the plankton in the food chain of the video game industry, are more and more interested in developing games for Google’s Android mobile operating system, according to a new Flash Game Market survey.
The survey shows that the Flash game development community is becoming more mature and financially savvy, as the developers are focusing on the markets with the most potential for growth. It was produced by Mochi Media, which helps developers monetize their games, as well as Flash creator Adobe and FlashGameLicense.com. The survey of nearly 1,400 developers also shows that flash developers are open to getting their games on all sorts of new platforms in the name of reaching the widest number of users.
While 10 percent of the developers said they are currently developing on Android, more than 52 percent said they planned to begin doing so in the next year. That’s a big change from last year, when about 42 percent said they planned to make games for the iOS, or Apple’s iPod Touch, iPhone and iPad devices. Android has come on strong in the past year, toppling Nokia as the world’s leader in smartphones in the fourth quarter.
Flash gaming is also growing in popularity internationally, leading to new markets and talent pools. About 19 percent of the developers are from the U.S., down 15 percent from a year ago. About 8 percent are in the United Kingdom, and six percent are in the Russian Federation. Canada accounts for 5 percent, Ukraine is 4 percent, India is 4 percent, and Brazil is 3 percent.
Developers are making money through a lot of different means. Sponsorships are now the main source of revenues. The number of developers who report making money through sponsorships, licenses and custom game development increased 37 percentage points from the 2009 survey, jumping from 46 percent to 83 percent. In-game ads are also still popular, with 45 percent of developers taking advantage of this revenue stream.
The big change, Mochi Media product manager Colin Cupp said, is that developers now have access to many different types of monetization. Developers are also more experienced. About 27 percent have been making games for two to five years, and another 12 percent have been making Flash games for more than five years. About 8 percent of developers and publishers have published more than 21 games. But 63 percent have made five or fewer games.
“They can distribute their games and reach more people,” Cupp said. “They’re more sophisticated.”
About 60 percent of developers say they now make Flash games full-time, compared to 50 percent a year ago. Also, those developers are growing up into publishers, with 21 percent of companies now doing both development and publishing. Only 4 percent are just publishers. Some 75 percent say they are developers only, roughly the same as a year ago. In general, there’s still a shortage of Flash game developers, Cupp said.
About 97 percent of the developers are male and 75 percent of the developers are under 35. The largest age group is 25 years old to 35, which accounts for 43 percent of the population. A lot of the effort is solitary, with 57 percent of developers saying they make their games alone.
About 75 percent of games are made in less than three months. And 25 percent are made in less than a month.
But it’s still tough being a Flash game publisher. About 63 percent of Flash game sites get less than 200,000 visitors per month. About 32 percent of developers say that their games are played 200,000 times or less in their lifetimes. Only a lucky 3 percent say that their games have been played more than 10 million times. About 50 percent of developers say they make less than $500 a month from developing games. About 5 percent make more than $5,000 a month.
Here’s a look at last year’s survey.
Next Story: Egypt restores Internet access amid continued Mubarak protests Previous Story: Why rewriting code can be startup suicide
Some of the legal questions related to the individual mandate are, at least partially, policy questions. In particular, what does the individual mandate do? And can the law stand without it?
The argument conservatives are making right now is that the individual mandate regulates "economic inactivity." That's not a description anyone had heard of it back when conservatives were co-sponsoring bills with the individual mandate, and it's not what the policy's creator had in mind when he developed it. But that doesn't make it untrue.
To believe it, however, you need to adopt a very narrow definition of what's being affected here: Namely, the decision to purchase or not purchase health-care insurance. The more traditional view is that the individual mandate is one of a slew of rules and regulations bringing order to something much broader: The American health-care system, which all of us participate in. That's the view of the 38 health economists and academics who signed this brief (pdf). "There is no such thing as 'inactivity' or non-participation in the health care market," they wrote. "As the District Court" -- which ruled for the Affordable Care Act -- "recognized, virtually all Americans will, at some time during their life, require health care, either because of illness, accident, or the wear and tear of age."
Because health services are so expensive, the costs are defrayed over many years. That's what insurance does. And because we are a humane society, we have rules and regulations in place to ensure that people can get treated even if they don't have insurance. In that way, you may not be interested in the health-care system, but if you get hit by a bus, the health-care system is interested in you -- and that's true even though you weren't making an economic choice to become "active" in the health-care system when you stepped into the street. You were, by virtue of our laws and regulations and taxes, already an active participant. The authors of the brief make this point -- and its connection to the individual mandate -- well:
The requirement to obtain a minimal level of health insurance is predicated on the unique characteristics of the health care market -- the unavoidable need for medical care; the unpredictability of such need; the high cost of care; the inability of providers to refuse to provide care in emergency situations; and the very significant cost-shifting that underlies the way medical care is paid for in this country. Those characteristics do not obtain in other markets and, without them, the predicate for the kind of regulation adopted in Section 1501 does not exist. Hence, affirming Congress’ power to adopt Section 1501 will not open the door to unfettered expansion of federal power over individual liberty, as Appellants fear.
To make this more concrete, when an uninsured person breaks a leg and needs hospital care, that care is paid for by the rest of us. It'd be a bit odd for your economic inactivity to cost me money. But your decision to remain without insurance does cost me money, because you're an active consumer of health-care risk and an active participant on a health-care market that affords you certain benefits. When you don't purchase insurance, you've not decided against participating in the American health-care system. You're just not participating responsibly. To quote Mitt Romney:
Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on the government is not libertarian.
Then there's the question of severability -- can the law work without the mandate? The legislation does not specifically say that it can. And the Obama administration, in a calculated gamble to persuade the Court that the mandate passes constitutional muster through the "necessary and proper" clause, is currently arguing that it can't. This, at least in part, led Judge Vinson to void the entire bill. "In the final analysis, this Act has been analogized to a finely crafted watch,and that seems to fit," he wrote. "It has approximately 450 separate pieces, but one essential piece (the individual mandate) is defective and must be removed. It cannot function as originally designed."
The irony of all this is that one of the central arguments in the Democratic campaign for the presidency was between the Obama campaign, which didn't think health-care reform required an individual mandate, and the Clinton campaign, which thought it did. I was on Clinton's side in that debate, but the case is more nuanced than the Obama team allowed then or is admitting now. The legislation will work much better with an individual mandate. But many people will be covered, and many goals achieved, in the absence of the mandate.
benchcraft company scamAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
bench craft company reviews[reefeed]
benchcraft company scam
bench craft company reviewsAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
bench craft company reviews Flash game developers, who are like the plankton in the food chain of the video game industry, are more and more interested in developing games for Google’s Android mobile operating system, according to a new Flash Game Market survey.
The survey shows that the Flash game development community is becoming more mature and financially savvy, as the developers are focusing on the markets with the most potential for growth. It was produced by Mochi Media, which helps developers monetize their games, as well as Flash creator Adobe and FlashGameLicense.com. The survey of nearly 1,400 developers also shows that flash developers are open to getting their games on all sorts of new platforms in the name of reaching the widest number of users.
While 10 percent of the developers said they are currently developing on Android, more than 52 percent said they planned to begin doing so in the next year. That’s a big change from last year, when about 42 percent said they planned to make games for the iOS, or Apple’s iPod Touch, iPhone and iPad devices. Android has come on strong in the past year, toppling Nokia as the world’s leader in smartphones in the fourth quarter.
Flash gaming is also growing in popularity internationally, leading to new markets and talent pools. About 19 percent of the developers are from the U.S., down 15 percent from a year ago. About 8 percent are in the United Kingdom, and six percent are in the Russian Federation. Canada accounts for 5 percent, Ukraine is 4 percent, India is 4 percent, and Brazil is 3 percent.
Developers are making money through a lot of different means. Sponsorships are now the main source of revenues. The number of developers who report making money through sponsorships, licenses and custom game development increased 37 percentage points from the 2009 survey, jumping from 46 percent to 83 percent. In-game ads are also still popular, with 45 percent of developers taking advantage of this revenue stream.
The big change, Mochi Media product manager Colin Cupp said, is that developers now have access to many different types of monetization. Developers are also more experienced. About 27 percent have been making games for two to five years, and another 12 percent have been making Flash games for more than five years. About 8 percent of developers and publishers have published more than 21 games. But 63 percent have made five or fewer games.
“They can distribute their games and reach more people,” Cupp said. “They’re more sophisticated.”
About 60 percent of developers say they now make Flash games full-time, compared to 50 percent a year ago. Also, those developers are growing up into publishers, with 21 percent of companies now doing both development and publishing. Only 4 percent are just publishers. Some 75 percent say they are developers only, roughly the same as a year ago. In general, there’s still a shortage of Flash game developers, Cupp said.
About 97 percent of the developers are male and 75 percent of the developers are under 35. The largest age group is 25 years old to 35, which accounts for 43 percent of the population. A lot of the effort is solitary, with 57 percent of developers saying they make their games alone.
About 75 percent of games are made in less than three months. And 25 percent are made in less than a month.
But it’s still tough being a Flash game publisher. About 63 percent of Flash game sites get less than 200,000 visitors per month. About 32 percent of developers say that their games are played 200,000 times or less in their lifetimes. Only a lucky 3 percent say that their games have been played more than 10 million times. About 50 percent of developers say they make less than $500 a month from developing games. About 5 percent make more than $5,000 a month.
Here’s a look at last year’s survey.
Next Story: Egypt restores Internet access amid continued Mubarak protests Previous Story: Why rewriting code can be startup suicide
Some of the legal questions related to the individual mandate are, at least partially, policy questions. In particular, what does the individual mandate do? And can the law stand without it?
The argument conservatives are making right now is that the individual mandate regulates "economic inactivity." That's not a description anyone had heard of it back when conservatives were co-sponsoring bills with the individual mandate, and it's not what the policy's creator had in mind when he developed it. But that doesn't make it untrue.
To believe it, however, you need to adopt a very narrow definition of what's being affected here: Namely, the decision to purchase or not purchase health-care insurance. The more traditional view is that the individual mandate is one of a slew of rules and regulations bringing order to something much broader: The American health-care system, which all of us participate in. That's the view of the 38 health economists and academics who signed this brief (pdf). "There is no such thing as 'inactivity' or non-participation in the health care market," they wrote. "As the District Court" -- which ruled for the Affordable Care Act -- "recognized, virtually all Americans will, at some time during their life, require health care, either because of illness, accident, or the wear and tear of age."
Because health services are so expensive, the costs are defrayed over many years. That's what insurance does. And because we are a humane society, we have rules and regulations in place to ensure that people can get treated even if they don't have insurance. In that way, you may not be interested in the health-care system, but if you get hit by a bus, the health-care system is interested in you -- and that's true even though you weren't making an economic choice to become "active" in the health-care system when you stepped into the street. You were, by virtue of our laws and regulations and taxes, already an active participant. The authors of the brief make this point -- and its connection to the individual mandate -- well:
The requirement to obtain a minimal level of health insurance is predicated on the unique characteristics of the health care market -- the unavoidable need for medical care; the unpredictability of such need; the high cost of care; the inability of providers to refuse to provide care in emergency situations; and the very significant cost-shifting that underlies the way medical care is paid for in this country. Those characteristics do not obtain in other markets and, without them, the predicate for the kind of regulation adopted in Section 1501 does not exist. Hence, affirming Congress’ power to adopt Section 1501 will not open the door to unfettered expansion of federal power over individual liberty, as Appellants fear.
To make this more concrete, when an uninsured person breaks a leg and needs hospital care, that care is paid for by the rest of us. It'd be a bit odd for your economic inactivity to cost me money. But your decision to remain without insurance does cost me money, because you're an active consumer of health-care risk and an active participant on a health-care market that affords you certain benefits. When you don't purchase insurance, you've not decided against participating in the American health-care system. You're just not participating responsibly. To quote Mitt Romney:
Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on the government is not libertarian.
Then there's the question of severability -- can the law work without the mandate? The legislation does not specifically say that it can. And the Obama administration, in a calculated gamble to persuade the Court that the mandate passes constitutional muster through the "necessary and proper" clause, is currently arguing that it can't. This, at least in part, led Judge Vinson to void the entire bill. "In the final analysis, this Act has been analogized to a finely crafted watch,and that seems to fit," he wrote. "It has approximately 450 separate pieces, but one essential piece (the individual mandate) is defective and must be removed. It cannot function as originally designed."
The irony of all this is that one of the central arguments in the Democratic campaign for the presidency was between the Obama campaign, which didn't think health-care reform required an individual mandate, and the Clinton campaign, which thought it did. I was on Clinton's side in that debate, but the case is more nuanced than the Obama team allowed then or is admitting now. The legislation will work much better with an individual mandate. But many people will be covered, and many goals achieved, in the absence of the mandate.
benchcraft company scam
bench craft company reviewsAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
benchcraft company portland or
bench craft company reviewsAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
bench craft company reviewsAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
benchcraft company scamAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
how to lose weight fast benchcraft company portland or benchcraft company portland or
bench craft company reviews benchcraft company scamAt no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
benchcraft company portland or Google adsense is a good program for those who want to monetize their web site or blog. It is relatively easy to implement on your site or blog by simply installing a bit of code into the page. Google provides this code and it generates ads on your page according to the textyou already have in that page. For instance, if the text on yourpage is about the latest dog food scare from China, the google adsense ads will also be about dog food.
The first step is to get signed up for google adsense. Google makes this easy from their home page. Just click on "Advertising Programs" on the google hompage, follow from there, and you will be able to gather all the information needed to get started. As you get acquainted with customization of your google adsense ads, you will begin to wonder about colors and placement of the ads on your own page.
Its best to keep to a blended look of the ads with the color of your page. You probably are like me and do not really look to be "pitched" to when you are seeking information on the web. More than likely your readers are the same. If you can think like your readers, your google adsense ads will be more effective.
If you were to ask the so called "gurus" on the web your question of; "
How do I make money with google adsense ? ", more than likely you will find some basic similarites in their answers. One answer would be; "Do not design your site around google adsense.". If you want to start a web site solely for putting google adsense ads on it and making money, there are plenty of people already doing that as you read this. Google designed their adsense program as an option to monetize your web site, not as a stand-alone money maker for a web site.
There are no hard rules against building a site around google adsense, but most people, including myself are much more likely to go somewhere else when a site is dominated by ads instead of useful information. Google has the last word, of course, as to who gets to use their adsense system.
What is a perfect site for google adsense ads ? One that is already getting moderate, targeted traffic on a popular category. What is a popular category ? "A.T. and T cell phones" is one. There are many others, and you will want to do your own search to see if your particular site is one that would have the high paying google adsense ads.
If you are a Webmaster, take the time to do a thorough search in your range of interests. More than likely you can optimize at least a few of your pages to coincide with those higher paying google adsense ads and drive some of your visitors to those pages. Yes, they will be leaving your site, but you will also be making money.
As a summary, money can definitely be made with google adsense, but the best way to do it is to look for related top-paying categories for your own existing site
or blog. That way you can stay focused, and it will be more likely that your readers will also become repeat visitors as well.
big seminar 14At no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
big seminar 14At no time will Arab News attempt to alter the core meaning of a comment. 3. Reject the message, edit the message when the moderators judge it to be a personal attack, defamatory (or potentially defamatory), abusive, incite hatred or ...
CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views's authors are supported by a revenue-sharing agreement with the company that operates CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views, Important Media. Of course, it's never enough ...
Horse Tracks -- Your Daily Cup of Orange and Blue Coffee.
big seminar 14
